Netanyahu says Israeli troops will stay in Gaza, rejecting Trump's deal

Fact-check index: 58/100 — The core claims about Netanyahu's video statement and rejection of the disarmament deal are well-supported by the cited France24 and NZZ sources, but the article's editorializing about domestic-politics motive, the Lebanon strikes tie-in, and the 'signature diplomatic achievement' framing go beyond what the sources establish.

• Netanyahu rejected the terms of the Gaza disarmament deal announced by Trump — Directly confirmed by France24: 'Netanyahu has pushed back on a recent deal announced by US President Donald Trump for the disarmament of Hamas.'
• In a video statement, Netanyahu said the army will not pull back from current positions until Hamas is fully disarmed — France24: 'In a video posted to social media, Netanyahu said the Israeli army would not pull back from its current positions in the Gaza Strip until the full disarmament of Hamas.'
• Netanyahu's comments contradict the October ceasefire agreement he signed onto — France24 says the comments 'appear to contradict the terms of an October ceasefire deal,' but does not explicitly state Netanyahu personally 'signed onto' it — that detail is not verified in the given source.
• NZZ quotes Netanyahu saying Israel rejected the plan ('Wir haben abgelehnt') — Matches NZZ headline/quote directly.
• NZZ reports the decision is widely seen in Israel as aimed at the election campaign — NZZ's own subhead says the decision 'dürfte... vor allem auf den Wahlkampf schielen' (likely aimed primarily at the campaign) — this is NZZ's own assessment/framing, not evidence of a 'widely seen' consensus in Israel as the article implies.
• Timing follows fresh strikes on Gaza and into Lebanon, suggesting military/security calculations are also in play — Not addressed in either cited source (France24 or NZZ); relies on the article's own earlier, separately-cited coverage, not on material provided here.
• The disarmament deal was Washington's signature Middle East diplomatic achievement of the year — This characterization is not present in either source and appears to be the article's own editorial framing.
• Netanyahu's rejection raises the risk the framework collapses before implementation — An analytical/speculative claim not directly stated in either source, though a plausible inference from the reported contradiction.