Unie zařadila íránské soudce a představitele kybernetické skupiny na svůj lidskoprávní sankční seznam

Index ověření faktů: 72/100 — The article's core claims — the EU listing of Iranian judges and a cyber-group figure over persecution of dissidents/religious minorities, and a same-day US sanction on an Iranian financier — are accurately reflected and properly cited to the provided headlines, but the extensive EU-law procedural detail is accurate general knowledge that the thin source headlines do not actually establish.

• EU added Iranian judges and a leading cyber-group figure to its sanctions list — Directly matches Reuters, WMBD and Jerusalem Post headlines, which are cited.
• Listing freezes their EU-held assets and bars entry to the bloc — Consistent with how EU sanctions work, but the headlines do not state asset freezes or travel bans; inferred, not sourced.
• Listings rest on persecution of dissidents and religious minorities — Explicitly matches the cited Anadolu headline.
• The measures target the judiciary rather than ministers or security commanders — Reasonable characterization; 'judges' is in the headlines, though the ministers/commanders contrast is the author's framing.
• These are legally 'restrictive measures' agreed by the Council, falling under CFSP requiring unanimity of all 27 states — Accurate description of EU sanctions procedure generally, but not established by any provided source.
• Listing uses a Council Decision under Art. 29 TEU plus an implementing Regulation under Art. 215 TFEU, directly applicable across member states — Correct as general EU law, but no source here confirms the specific instruments used for this listing.
• A listing can be challenged before the General Court, generally within two months of publication/notification — Accurate legal background but not derived from the cited headlines.
• On the same day, the US separately sanctioned an Iranian financier — Jerusalem Post headline pairs the two actions and names the US financier sanction, but does not explicitly assert they occurred on the same day.
• EU and US actions may be coordinated rather than coincidental — Article correctly flags this as plausible but unconfirmed; no source supports coordination.
• The authoritative text will be the Official Journal setting out names, reasons and legal base; number of judges and cyber figure's identity remain open — Plausible and appropriately hedged, but not confirmed by the headline-only sources.
• The EU has both a dedicated Iran human-rights framework and a horizontal Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime — Accurate general fact about EU regimes; not established by the provided sources.