USA útočí na Írán sedmou noc v řadě, údery míří i na civilní infrastrukturu

Index ověření faktů: 72/100 — The article's central factual claims — seventh consecutive night of US strikes, Hormuz escalation, collapsed ceasefire, energy-security threat, and civilian-infrastructure targeting — are each directly supported by a cited headline, but the sources are only headlines (no article bodies), so causal framing, the bridges/railways/Kuwait carryover details, and the intent/casualty caveats remain unverified.

• US struck Iran for a seventh consecutive night — Both The Guardian and ABC7 New York headlines explicitly state a seventh night/7th night in a row of US strikes.
• Fighting is escalating over the Strait of Hormuz — Guardian ('Hormuz conflict escalates') and ABC7 ('fighting escalates over Strait of Hormuz') headlines both confirm this.
• The escalation threatens global energy security and is tied to a collapsed ceasefire — The Daily Scrum News headline directly states 'Threatens Global Energy Security As Ceasefire Collapses'; matches the article's framing.
• US and Iranian forces are now targeting civilian infrastructure — Foreign Policy headline 'U.S., Iranian Forces Target Civilian Infrastructure' directly supports this, cited correctly.
• Hormuz is the passage through which a large share of the world's seaborne oil moves — Widely established background fact, but not stated in any of the provided headlines; presented as context rather than sourced from the material.
• Prior US strikes damaged Iranian bridges and railways, and Kuwait reported damage to a power and water plant — Attributed to the outlet's own earlier coverage, not to any of the four provided sources; the headlines here do not mention bridges, railways, or Kuwait.
• The campaign is broadening from strike-for-strike into pressure on civilian systems (intent) — Framed by the article itself as a hypothesis with explicit caveats; supported only insofar as Foreign Policy's headline names civilian infrastructure, but intent and scope are not established by headlines alone.
• A ceasefire existed and has since collapsed — The Daily Scrum News headline 'As Ceasefire Collapses' supports the collapse; the prior existence is implied by the same phrasing.
• The security premium on oil and shipping rises even without a tanker being sunk — Analytical/market inference by the author; not supported by any headline text, which give no pricing or market detail.
• Escalation ladder has run for a week without an off-ramp — Consistent with 'seventh night' from the headlines, but 'no off-ramp' is interpretive and not sourced.