USA podepsaly jadernou dohodu se Saúdskou Arábií – co se tím ve skutečnosti změnilo

Index ověření faktů: 74/100 — The article's core factual claims — the Wednesday signing by Wright and Prince Abdulaziz, the two documents, the Guardian 'landmark' framing, and Foreign Policy's Trump-approval report — are all accurately drawn from and correctly cited to the sources, while the heavier enrichment analysis and 'earlier coverage' references rely on material not present in the provided sources.

• Chris Wright signed a civilian nuclear cooperation pact and a separate bilateral safeguards deal with Saudi Arabia on Wednesday — France 24 states exactly this: Wright signed the pact and a separate bilateral safeguards deal.
• The signing took place alongside Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman — Named explicitly in France 24.
• The Guardian called it a 'landmark deal' — Guardian headline: 'US signs landmark nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia.'
• Foreign Policy reported that President Trump approved the agreement — Foreign Policy headline: 'Trump Approves U.S. Nuclear Deal With Saudi Arabia.'
• The two documents were signed together at the same event, not separately, per France 24 — France 24 confirms both were signed by Wright at the same announcement, though it labels the safeguards deal 'separate'; 'signed together' is a fair but slightly interpretive reading.
• The cooperation pact covers reactors, fuel, and technology (the peaceful side) — Sources say only 'civilian nuclear cooperation'; the specific scope (reactors, fuel, technology) is plausible elaboration not stated in the material.
• Washington had earlier signalled willingness to let Saudi Arabia enrich uranium on its own soil — Attributed to the outlet's own prior coverage; none of the three provided sources mention enrichment.
• Saudi enrichment is the point that most worries non-proliferation experts / the central open question — Analytical framing; no source here addresses enrichment or expert concern.
• Neither government has published the text of the agreements — Not stated in any provided source; cannot be confirmed.
• The safeguards deal functions as rules to keep the civilian programme from drifting toward a weapon — Reasonable characterization of a 'safeguards deal,' but the sources give no detail on its content or stringency.
• Whether Congress will review or move to block the deal (item to watch) — Forward-looking speculation not addressed by the sources.