EU během jediného dne zažalovala sedm vlastních členů. Jak to vlastně funguje

Index ověření faktů: 66/100 — All six core news claims (the specific referrals of Spain, Greece, Romania, Hungary, and the two additional Spain cases) are accurately stated and properly cited to matching source headlines, but the article's substantial explanatory material about the infringement procedure, court penalties, and timelines is background knowledge not established by the headline-only sources.

• Commission referred Spain to the Court of Justice over recognition of professional qualifications — Matches cited source headline exactly.
• Commission referred Greece over discriminatory employment conditions for teachers in public schools — Matches cited source headline exactly.
• Commission referred Romania for failing to pay pharmacies on time — Matches cited source headline; article links a valid variant of the Romania story URL.
• Commission referred Hungary over price margin restrictions on food and drugstore products — Matches cited source headline on price margin restrictions for food products and drugstore articles.
• Spain was also referred for failing to transpose the directive on banks' own funds and eligible liabilities — Reasonable paraphrase of the cited headline on the 'minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities' directive; 'banks'' is an inference but consistent with MREL subject matter.
• Spain was referred alongside Ireland, France and the Netherlands for failing to transpose EU cybersecurity rules — Matches cited source headline listing Ireland, Spain, France and the Netherlands.
• The sweep touches seven member states — Correct count derivable from the sources: Spain, Greece, Romania, Hungary, Ireland, France, Netherlands.
• These referrals happened 'this week' as one batched infringement round — Sources carry no dates and do not state the cases were decided together in a single round, though the uniform framing makes it plausible.
• The infringement procedure runs letter of formal notice → reasoned opinion → court referral, with typical two-month reply deadlines — Accurate as general EU-law background but not established anywhere in the source material.
• The Commission is called the 'guardian of the treaties' and escalation is decided collectively by the College of Commissioners in monthly batched rounds — General background not present in the headline-only sources.
• Every country in this week's sweep already ignored two formal warnings — Inferred from the standard procedure; the sources say nothing about prior letters or reasoned opinions in these specific cases.
• The Court of Justice sits in Luxembourg and financial penalties normally require a second referral after a ruling is ignored — Accurate general knowledge (Article 260 TFEU) but unsupported by the sources.