Komise mění navrhovanou daň pro velké firmy, aby odblokovala rozpočet EU

Index ověření faktů: 64/100 — The article's two source-backed claims (a levy on firms above €100M turnover, criticised by business lobbies and national governments, being reworked to unlock the EU budget deal) are accurate and properly cited to Politico, but the bulk of the substance — own-resources status, MFF details, and the unanimity-plus-ratification procedure — is accurate EU background not established by the thin source provided.

• Commission is reworking a proposed big-business tax to clear the way for a deal on the EU's next long-term budget — Matches the Politico headline 'Commission eyes changes to big business tax to unlock budget deal'; cited.
• The levy targets firms with annual turnover above €100 million — Source states a levy on companies with turnover above €100 million; figure matches exactly.
• Business lobbies and national governments have criticised the levy — Verbatim match with the source sentence; correctly attributed to Politico.
• Brussels wants the levy to become a new 'own resource' feeding the EU budget directly — Not mentioned anywhere in the provided source; plausible and consistent with EU proposals but not established here.
• New own resources are central to financing the next multiannual financial framework, a seven-year spending plan — Accurate general knowledge about the MFF, but the source material contains no reference to own resources or the MFF.
• Most EU laws pass by qualified majority, with no single-country veto — Correct as a general description of ordinary EU decision-making, but not in the source.
• Creating a new own resource requires unanimity in the Council after consulting the Parliament, then ratification by all 27 member states per their constitutional requirements — Accurately reflects the Own Resources Decision procedure (Art. 311 TFEU) in reality, but the source does not address procedure at all.
• This 'double lock' gives every government, and sometimes every national parliament, an effective veto — the highest procedural bar in the EU — Reasonable characterisation grounded in the correct procedure, but analytical and entirely unsupported by the cited source.
• Criticism comes from two directions: business lobbies and wary national governments — Directly supported by the source, which names both groups; correctly cited to Politico.
• The redesign may be driven more by the arithmetic of unanimity than the tax's economics — Explicitly framed as a hedged hypothesis; not asserted as fact and not derivable from the source.
• Watch whether the Commission raises the €100M threshold, narrows the levy, or swaps it for another own resource — Forward-looking speculation; not present in or supported by the source material.